DSA Trust Seal in the register
The seal marks traceability of a technical determination protocol: finding ID, timestamp, SHA-256 hash and public layer trace. It is not a legal assessment, not a decision-quality review and not a liability release.
DSA becomes clear when input case, layer trace and technical determination are visible together.
The seal marks traceability of a technical determination protocol: finding ID, timestamp, SHA-256 hash and public layer trace. It is not a legal assessment, not a decision-quality review and not a liability release.
In none of the five sample cases was the effect the problem. The problem was missing reliable prior binding.
ATTRIBUTION_GAP
Effect evidenced; binding prior state not attributable.
TECHNICAL_BINDING_MISSING
Automated effect evidenced; prior human decision state absent.
TEMPORAL_BINDING_MISSING
Operational effect visible; time-bound decision state missing.
EVIDENCE_ANCHOR_INSUFFICIENT
Payment block evidenced; final prior binding insufficiently anchored.
RECONSTRUCTION_ONLY
Measure evidenced; prior binding predominantly reconstructive.
A financial services provider uses an AI-supported risk model. A credit limit was automatically reduced and a credit line partly frozen. Logs, scoring and dashboard evidence the effect. A documented human approval before triggering is missing.
Question: Was a reliable decision state technically existent and neutrally determinable before the critical system effect?
Finding-ID: DSA-F-20260705-7c91d8f2 Timestamp UTC: 2026-07-05T00:00:00Z Classification: TECHNICAL_BINDING_MISSING Traffic: Red Short finding: Effect evidenced, binding state before effect not established. Public layer trace: L1 decision content: recognized L2 temporal binding: present L3 actor binding: unclear L4 evidence anchor: strong L5 binding moment: not determinable L6 attribution: missing L7 effect: connectable L8 reconstruction: high Boundary: Technical structure review. No legal advice. No liability assessment.